Whitepaper
  • Whitepaper
  • Terminology
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Vision
  • Overview
    • Current Problems of Existing Blockchain Networks
      • Trilemma
      • Transaction Speed
      • User Experience
      • Software Development
      • Decentralization
    • Metatime Solution
  • MetaChain
    • An Overview for MetaChain
    • MetaAnthill
    • EVM to MVM
    • MetaChain Consensus Mechanism: PoM
    • Transaction Check Per Second (TCPS)
  • Proof of Meta Consensus Mechanism
    • MetaMiner (MPoS & MetaAnthill)
      • Fees and Rewards
    • MacroMiner (MPoH & MetaAnthill)
      • Archive Node
      • Full Node
      • Light Node
    • MicroMiner (MPoSW & MetaAnthill)
  • Scalability
    • Blockchain Network Structure
    • Energy Consumption
  • Smart Contract
    • Smart Contract Compatibility
    • Smart Contract Fees
  • Transaction
    • Transaction Fees
  • Attack Vectors & Security
    • Transaction Denial
    • Eclipse Attack
    • Double Spending
  • Native Token
    • Metatime Coin (MTC)
    • Token Burning
      • Transaction Fee Burning
      • Constant Burning
  • Experimental Results
  • Information
  • Audit
  • Solution and Conclusion
    • Focused on 'Human'
  • References
  • Disclaimer
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Attack Vectors & Security

Double Spending

PreviousEclipse AttackNextNative Token

Last updated 1 year ago

Double-spending is a type of attack where the attacker makes the same transaction operation to be performed more than once.

The attacker aims to make multiple expenses by sending the same signed transaction back to the network while the transaction is still in the process of being recorded in blocks.

The same transaction sent more than once by the attacker is subjected to the "Pre-verified Sign Is Valid" stage by MetaAnthill. Unsigned transactions are denied directly, and nodes are prevented from performing the same transaction a second time.